Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home Justin Hernandez AI Contract Trading Exchange Funding Arbitrage Risk Risk Primer

AI Contract Trading Exchange Funding Arbitrage Risk Risk Primer

When execution feels random, it is often because the order path changes under stress and nobody explains the switch. If something feels off, troubleshoot in layers: data -> pricing -> margin -> execution -> post-trade monitoring. In calm markets, a platform can look identical to competitors. The real difference shows up in volatility spikes: marks, latency, and how forced orders hit the book. First, confirm whether marks diverged from index. Next, check whether fees or funding changed equity unexpectedly. Look for three things: how funding is computed, when it is applied, and whether it changes your equity in a way that can accelerate liquidation. Measure funding, basis, and realized volatility together. Funding alone is a weak signal, but the combination can reveal crowded positioning and liquidation risk. Example: a 25x position with a 0.06% taker fee can lose more than a full maintenance step from fees alone if forced to close during a fast move. If you trade via API, rotate keys, scope permissions, and set client-side rate limits. Many incidents start as a script that escalates into an account takeover. A useful habit is to snapshot funding before entry, then watch how it changes when volatility shifts; sudden flips often signal crowded risk. Aivora frames these topics as system behavior, not hype: verify definitions, test edge cases, and keep risk controls simple enough to audit. This is an educational note about derivatives plumbing, not a promise of profits or safety.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.